What Eye Movements Can Tell about Theory of Mind in a Strategic Game

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

What Eye Movements Can Tell about Theory of Mind in a Strategic Game

Ben Meijering^1*, Hedderik van Rijn², Niels A. Taatgen¹,Rineke Verbrugge¹

1 Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Citation: Meijering B, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA, Verbrugge R (2012) What Eye Movements Can Tell about Theory of Mind in a Strategic Game. PLoS ONE 7(9): e45961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045961

Abstract

This study investigates strategies in reasoning about mental states of others, a process that requires theory of mind. It is a first step in studying the cognitive basis of such reasoning, as strategies affect tradeoffs between cognitive resources. Participants were presented with a two-player game that required reasoning about the mental states of the opponent. Game theory literature discerns two candidate strategies that participants could use in this game: either forward reasoning or backward reasoning. Forward reasoning proceeds from the first decision point to the last, whereas backward reasoning proceeds in the opposite direction. Backward reasoning is the only optimal strategy, because the optimal outcome is known at each decision point. Nevertheless, we argue that participants prefer forward reasoning because it is similar to causal reasoning. Causal reasoning, in turn, is prevalent in human reasoning. Eye movements were measured to discern between forward and backward progressions of fixations. The observed fixation sequences corresponded best with forward reasoning. Early in games, the probability of observing a forward progression of fixations is higher than the probability of observing a backward progression. Later in games, the probabilities of forward and backward progressions are similar, which seems to imply that participants were either applying backward reasoning or jumping back to previous decision points while applying forward reasoning. Thus, the game-theoretical favorite strategy, backward reasoning, does seem to exist in human reasoning. However, participants preferred the more familiar, practiced, and prevalent strategy: forward reasoning.

______________________________

Tracing Knowledge Notification | Ειδοποίηση Στα ίχνη της Γνώσης

UNMODIFIED COPY
of the original post, out of respect to the source (*) and readers.
Please follow the provided link for references and more informations.

(*) including scientists,artists,philosophers,writers,publishers,journalists and their entire work.

ΑΠΑΡΑΛΛΑΚΤΟ ΑΝΤΙΓΡΑΦΟ
της πρωτότυπης δημοσίευσης με σεβασμό στην πηγή και στους αναγνώστες.
Παρακαλώ επισκεφθείτε τον σύνδεσμο για περισσότερες πληροφορίες.

______________________________

Read directly from the source (open access)

Article in Pdf file (for personal use only) What Eye Movements Can Tell about Theory of Mind in a Strategic Game
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Φύση και ανάπτυξη της Θεωρίας του Νου

Αρχείο σε μορφή Pdf (για προσωπική χρήση)

Φύση και ανάπτυξη της Θεωρίας του Νου

_________________________________________________________________________________________________ 


Ben Meijering, Hedderik van Rijn, Niels A. Taatgen, & Rineke Verbrugge1 (2012).
What Eye Movements Can Tell about Theory of Mind in a Strategic Game
PLoS ONE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045961

_________________________________________________________________________________________________